Monthly Archives: September 2013

Premises Liability Attorney Long Beach, New York

Premises Liability Introduction for Long Beach, New York

A premises liability claim holds a property owner responsible for any damages emerging out of an injury on that person or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that inhabit a property should make a reasonable effort to maintain a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the residential or commercial property safe for visitors leads to “properties liability.” Typical circumstances that might trigger facilities liability suits are:

  • Animal and Pet dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Dangerous Residential or commercial property
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Swimming Pool Injury
  • Insufficient Upkeep
  • Kids on Home
  • Retailer Liability
  • Dining establishment Liability

Industrial Properties

What about injuries at apartment building or industrial property that is simply leased? Typically, a property owner is not responsible for the injuries of an occupant’s guest because the tenant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the property. Nevertheless, there are exceptions, such as for hidden problems, which are concealed and unsafe conditions already existing when the tenant acquires the property. Another exception happens when a proprietor carries out repair works for an occupant. The repair works should be carried out in a non-negligent manner.

Different states follow different rules about who may recover for facilities liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the individual going to the home to figure out whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is usually invitee, licensee, or intruder.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Long Beach, NY 11561

An invitee is somebody welcomed onto a property for a commercial purpose, such as a client at a shopping mall. A social guest or licensee is likewise present on the property at the invite or by approval of the homeowner or occupant. For guests and licensees, the invite is an implied pledge that it is safe to be on the property. In some states, a different responsibility of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is an invitee or licensee, however in other states that acknowledge these differences, the greatest task of care is owed to both.

In lots of states that focus on the status of the visitor to evaluate liability, intruders who are on the property with no right to be there and who are injured are not able to recover at all. The owner or resident need to simply avoid deliberately aiming to hurt the intruder, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, in some cases, when an owner understands it is most likely there will be an intruder, it is required to offer reasonable warnings of non-obvious dangers to trespassers. Usually, the exception to this guideline is a child trespasser, who may get involved with an “appealing nuisance,” like a swimming pool, and hence is owed a greater task of care.

Stae of the Property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 11561

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Generally, homeowner and residents owe a task to keep residential or commercial property fairly safe and make repair works for all visitors except for intruders. Aspects that are considered when figuring out the responsibility are the scenarios under which the visitor came onto the property, the nature of the property, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to repair or warn, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or resident must regularly inspect the property to discover unsafe conditions and either fix them or put up a warning so that legal visitors are not injured. Any owner that fails to fulfill this responsibility, such as by knowing of an unsafe condition and cannot alert visitors, can be held liable for visitors’ injuries that arise from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Premises Liability

Most states follow the principles of relative fault in facilities liability cases. This means an injured person who is partially or totally responsible for what happened can not recuperate for damages developing out of a harmful residential or commercial property condition. A visitor has the duty to utilize sensible care to keep himself or herself safe. To the extent the visitor fails to utilize affordable care, the healing can be decreased by his or her portion of fault.

For instance, in a state following relative negligence, when an injured person is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the plaintiff may be unable to recover at all if she or he is discovered even a little at fault.