Monthly Archives: February 2016

Premises Liability Attorney Hanover, Illinois

Facilities Liability Summary for Hanover, Illinois

A premises liability claim holds a property owner responsible for any damages emerging out of an injury on that individual or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that occupy a property should make a sensible effort to keep a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the residential or commercial property safe for visitors leads to “facilities liability.” Common situations that may give rise to facilities liability lawsuits are:

  • Animal and Canine Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Unsafe Home
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Upkeep
  • Kids on Property
  • Retailer Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Industrial Residences

What about injuries at apartment complexes or industrial home that is merely leased? Generally, a property owner is not responsible for the injuries of a tenant’s guest because the renter is presumed to be in control of the condition of the residential or commercial property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden problems, which are hidden and harmful conditions already existing when the tenant acquires the property. Another exception occurs when a landlord undertakes repair works for a tenant. The repairs should be performed in a non-negligent way.

Different states follow different guidelines about who may recover for premises liability and under which conditions. Some states focus on the status of the individual checking out the home to figure out whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is usually guest, licensee, or intruder.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Hanover, IL 61041

A guest is someone invited onto a residential or commercial property for an industrial function, such as a consumer at a shopping mall. A social guest or licensee is also present on the property at the invite or by permission of the property owner or occupant. For invitees and licensees, the invitation is an implied promise that it is safe to be on the residential or commercial property. In some states, a different responsibility of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is an invitee or licensee, but in other states that recognize these distinctions, the greatest responsibility of care is owed to both.

In many states that focus on the status of the visitor to examine liability, trespassers who are on the residential or commercial property without any right to be there and who are harmed are unable to recuperate at all. The owner or occupant must simply refrain from deliberately trying to injure the intruder, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, sometimes, when an owner knows it is most likely there will be an intruder, it is required to offer sensible warnings of non-obvious dangers to trespassers. Normally, the exception to this guideline is a kid trespasser, who may get included with an “attractive annoyance,” like a pool, and therefore is owed a higher duty of care.

Stae of the Home; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 61041

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the home and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Typically, property owner and residents owe a duty to keep residential or commercial property reasonably safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Factors that are considered when determining the duty are the scenarios under which the visitor came onto the property, the nature of the residential or commercial property, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to fix or caution, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or resident must frequently examine the home to find dangerous conditions and either fix them or put up a caution so that legal visitors are not injured. Any owner that cannot satisfy this responsibility, such as by understanding of a dangerous condition and failing to warn visitors, can be held liable for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Premises Liability

Many states follow the principles of comparative fault in facilities liability cases. This implies an injured individual who is partly or fully responsible for what occurred can not recuperate for damages occurring from a dangerous residential or commercial property condition. A visitor has the responsibility to use sensible care to keep himself or herself safe. To the level the visitor cannot utilize sensible care, the healing can be reduced by his/her percentage of fault.

For instance, in a state following comparative negligence, when an injured individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is responsible for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the plaintiff may be unable to recuperate at all if she or he is found even slightly at fault.