Category Archives: Arizona

Premises Liability Attorney Stanfield, Arizona

Premises Liability Overview for Stanfield, Arizona

A premises liability lawsuit holds a homeowner responsible for any damages arising from an injury on that person or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that occupy a home must make an affordable effort to preserve a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the property safe for visitors results in “premises liability.” Typical situations that may generate properties liability claims are:

  • Animal and Pet Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Unsafe Property
  • Irresponsible or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Upkeep
  • Kids on Property
  • Retailer Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Commercial Residences

Exactly what about injuries at apartment building or industrial residential or commercial property that is merely leased? Typically, a property owner is not responsible for the injuries of a renter’s visitor since the tenant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden flaws, which are hidden and dangerous conditions currently existing when the occupant takes possession of the property. Another exception occurs when a property manager carries out repairs for a tenant. The repair works should be performed in a non-negligent way.

Different states follow various guidelines about who may recuperate for premises liability and under which conditions. Some states focus on the status of the person checking out the residential or commercial property to identify whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is generally guest, licensee, or trespasser.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Stanfield, AZ 85272

A guest is someone welcomed onto a property for a commercial function, such as a consumer at a shopping center. A social guest or licensee is likewise present on the residential or commercial property at the invitation or by approval of the homeowner or occupant. For guests and licensees, the invite is an implied promise that it is safe to be on the property. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, however in other states that recognize these differences, the highest responsibility of care is owed to both.

In lots of states that focus on the status of the visitor to evaluate liability, trespassers who are on the residential or commercial property with no right to be there and who are injured are not able to recover at all. The owner or occupant need to just refrain from deliberately attempting to injure the trespasser, such as by setting traps. However, in many cases, when an owner understands it is most likely there will be a trespasser, it is required to give affordable warnings of non-obvious dangers to trespassers. Normally, the exception to this guideline is a kid intruder, who may get included with an “attractive annoyance,” like a pool, and thus is owed a greater duty of care.

Stae of the Residential or commercial property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 85272

In other states, courts focus on the state of the residential or commercial property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Typically, property owner and occupants owe a duty to keep home fairly safe and make repair works for all visitors except for intruders. Elements that are thought about when figuring out the responsibility are the circumstances under which the visitor came onto the residential or commercial property, the nature of the home, the reasonableness of the owner or resident’s actions to repair or warn, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant must regularly inspect the home to discover hazardous conditions and either repair them or install a caution so that legal visitors are not hurt. Any owner that fails to fulfill this task, such as by knowing of an unsafe condition and cannot alert visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that arise from it.

Limitations on Recovering for Property Liability

Many states follow the concepts of comparative fault in properties liability cases. This suggests a hurt person who is partly or fully responsible for what happened can not recover for damages occurring out of a dangerous property condition. A visitor has the duty to use affordable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the level the visitor fails to utilize sensible care, the healing can be reduced by his/her percentage of fault.

For example, in a state following relative negligence, when an injured person is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is responsible for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s recovery will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributing negligence, the complainant may be unable to recover at all if she or he is found even slightly at fault.