Category Archives: West Virginia

Premises Liability Attorney Tunnelton, West Virginia

Facilities Liability Summary for Tunnelton, West Virginia

A property liability suit holds a homeowner responsible for any damages developing from an injury on that individual or entity’s property. In all states, owners that inhabit a property must make an affordable effort to keep a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the property safe for visitors leads to “premises liability.” Typical circumstances that may give rise to facilities liability claims are:

  • Animal and Dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Mishaps
  • Harmful Property
  • Irresponsible or Inadequate Security
  • Swimming Pool Injury
  • Insufficient Upkeep
  • Children on Residential or commercial property
  • Retail Store Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Commercial Properties

Exactly what about injuries at apartment building or commercial property that is simply rented? Usually, a landlord is not responsible for the injuries of a tenant’s visitor due to the fact that the tenant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden flaws, which are hidden and harmful conditions already existing when the occupant takes possession of the property. Another exception occurs when a property owner undertakes repairs for a tenant. The repairs should be carried out in a non-negligent manner.

Different states follow different rules about who might recover for properties liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the individual going to the home to identify whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is normally guest, licensee, or trespasser.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Tunnelton, WV 26444

An invitee is somebody invited onto a residential or commercial property for a business purpose, such as a customer at a shopping mall. A social guest or licensee is also present on the residential or commercial property at the invitation or by permission of the homeowner or resident. For invitees and licensees, the invite is an implied promise that it is safe to be on the home. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is an invitee or licensee, however in other states that acknowledge these differences, the greatest duty of care is owed to both.

In numerous states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to evaluate liability, intruders who are on the residential or commercial property without any right to be there and who are harmed are unable to recover at all. The owner or occupant need to merely refrain from purposefully aiming to injure the trespasser, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, in many cases, when an owner knows it is most likely there will be a trespasser, it is required to provide sensible warnings of non-obvious dangers to trespassers. Typically, the exception to this rule is a child intruder, who may get included with an “appealing annoyance,” like a pool, and thus is owed a higher responsibility of care.

Stae of the Property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 26444

In other states, courts focus on the state of the home and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Typically, homeowner and occupants owe a task to keep property reasonably safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Aspects that are considered when determining the duty are the circumstances under which the visitor came onto the home, the nature of the residential or commercial property, the reasonableness of the owner or resident’s actions to repair or caution, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant need to regularly check the residential or commercial property to find unsafe conditions and either repair them or put up a warning so that lawful visitors are not injured. Any owner that fails to satisfy this responsibility, such as by knowing of an unsafe condition and cannot warn visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Premises Liability

The majority of states follow the principles of comparative fault in facilities liability cases. This suggests an injured person who is partially or completely responsible for exactly what happened can not recover for damages developing from a hazardous property condition. A visitor has the responsibility to utilize affordable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the extent the visitor fails to use affordable care, the healing can be reduced by his or her percentage of fault.

For instance, in a state following relative negligence, when a hurt individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the complainant may be not able to recuperate at all if she or he is discovered even slightly at fault.