Premises Liability Attorney Aleknagik, Alaska

Properties Liability Summary for Aleknagik, Alaska

A property liability claim holds a property owner responsible for any damages emerging out of an injury on that individual or entity’s home. In all states, owners that occupy a property must make an affordable effort to preserve a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the residential or commercial property safe for visitors leads to “facilities liability.” Common situations that might give rise to premises liability claims are:

  • Animal and Dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Dangerous Residential or commercial property
  • Irresponsible or Inadequate Security
  • Swimming Pool Injury
  • Insufficient Maintenance
  • Kids on Residential or commercial property
  • Store Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Business Properties

What about injuries at apartment building or industrial residential or commercial property that is merely rented? Generally, a landlord is not responsible for the injuries of a tenant’s visitor because the tenant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the residential or commercial property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden flaws, which are hidden and harmful conditions already existing when the occupant seizes the residential or commercial property. Another exception takes place when a property manager undertakes repairs for a tenant. The repair works should be performed in a non-negligent way.

Various states follow various guidelines about who may recover for premises liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the individual visiting the residential or commercial property to determine whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is generally invitee, licensee, or trespasser.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Aleknagik, AK 99555

An invitee is someone invited onto a residential or commercial property for a commercial function, such as a consumer at a shopping mall. A social visitor or licensee is likewise present on the property at the invite or by authorization of the homeowner or resident. For invitees and licensees, the invite is an implied pledge that it is safe to be on the residential or commercial property. In some states, a different responsibility of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is an invitee or licensee, but in other states that acknowledge these distinctions, the highest duty of care is owed to both.

In lots of states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to evaluate liability, trespassers who are on the property with no right to be there and who are hurt are not able to recover at all. The owner or resident need to simply avoid deliberately trying to injure the intruder, such as by setting traps. However, sometimes, when an owner understands it is likely there will be a trespasser, it is needed to give affordable warnings of non-obvious risks to intruders. Generally, the exception to this rule is a child trespasser, who might get involved with an “appealing annoyance,” like a pool, and thus is owed a higher task of care.

Stae of the Home; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 99555

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the home and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Generally, homeowner and residents owe a task to keep property fairly safe and make repair works for all visitors except for trespassers. Aspects that are considered when determining the responsibility are the scenarios under which the visitor came onto the residential or commercial property, the nature of the home, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to repair or alert, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or resident should routinely inspect the home to discover dangerous conditions and either fix them or put up a caution so that lawful visitors are not injured. Any owner that cannot satisfy this responsibility, such as by knowing of a hazardous condition and cannot alert visitors, can be held accountable for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Property Liability

The majority of states follow the principles of comparative fault in facilities liability cases. This indicates a hurt person who is partially or completely responsible for what occurred can not recuperate for damages occurring out of a harmful residential or commercial property condition. A visitor has the task to use sensible care to keep himself or herself safe. To the level the visitor cannot utilize affordable care, the recovery can be decreased by his/her portion of fault.

For example, in a state following relative negligence, when an injured person is 10% responsible for an injury, the property owner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the complainant may be not able to recuperate at all if he or she is discovered even somewhat at fault.