Premises Liability Attorney Allston, Massachusetts

Premises Liability Introduction for Allston, Massachusetts

A premises liability claim holds a property owner responsible for any damages developing from an injury on that person or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that inhabit a residential or commercial property must make an affordable effort to maintain a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the property safe for visitors leads to “premises liability.” Typical situations that might give rise to premises liability lawsuits are:

  • Animal and Canine Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Hazardous Home
  • Irresponsible or Inadequate Security
  • Swimming Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Upkeep
  • Kids on Home
  • Store Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Commercial Residences

What about injuries at apartment building or industrial property that is merely rented? Typically, a property owner is not responsible for the injuries of a renter’s guest because the occupant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the home. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden flaws, which are concealed and dangerous conditions already existing when the tenant acquires the residential or commercial property. Another exception happens when a property owner undertakes repair works for a tenant. The repairs must be carried out in a non-negligent way.

Various states follow different guidelines about who might recover for premises liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the person going to the residential or commercial property to identify whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is typically guest, licensee, or trespasser.

Guests and Tresspassors: Rules for Allston, MA 02134

An invitee is someone invited onto a residential or commercial property for a business purpose, such as a customer at a mall. A social visitor or licensee is also present on the residential or commercial property at the invitation or by approval of the property owner or occupant. For guests and licensees, the invite is an implied guarantee that it is safe to be on the property. In some states, a various responsibility of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, but in other states that recognize these differences, the highest task of care is owed to both.

In numerous states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to assess liability, intruders who are on the home without any right to be there and who are hurt are not able to recover at all. The owner or resident should merely avoid deliberately trying to hurt the trespasser, such as by setting traps. However, sometimes, when an owner understands it is most likely there will be an intruder, it is needed to give sensible cautions of non-obvious threats to trespassers. Typically, the exception to this guideline is a child intruder, who may get included with an “appealing nuisance,” like a pool, and hence is owed a higher task of care.

Stae of the Home; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 02134

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the residential or commercial property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Usually, homeowner and residents owe a responsibility to keep residential or commercial property fairly safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Aspects that are considered when determining the responsibility are the situations under which the visitor came onto the home, the nature of the property, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to repair or alert, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or resident should frequently check the property to discover unsafe conditions and either fix them or set up a caution so that lawful visitors are not hurt. Any owner that fails to satisfy this task, such as by knowing of a hazardous condition and cannot alert visitors, can be held liable for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Property Liability

The majority of states follow the principles of relative fault in premises liability cases. This indicates a hurt person who is partially or fully responsible for what took place can not recover for damages developing out of an unsafe residential or commercial property condition. A visitor has the responsibility to use sensible care to keep himself or herself safe. To the extent the visitor fails to use affordable care, the recovery can be reduced by his/her percentage of fault.

For instance, in a state following comparative negligence, when a hurt person is 10% responsible for an injury, the property owner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s recovery will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the plaintiff might be unable to recuperate at all if he or she is found even somewhat at fault.