Premises Liability Attorney Athol, Massachusetts

Facilities Liability Introduction for Athol, Massachusetts

A premises liability claim holds a homeowner responsible for any damages emerging out of an injury on that person or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that occupy a home should make an affordable effort to preserve a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the home safe for visitors results in “properties liability.” Common scenarios that might trigger premises liability claims are:

  • Animal and Pet dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Harmful Residential or commercial property
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Upkeep
  • Kids on Residential or commercial property
  • Store Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Commercial Characteristics

Exactly what about injuries at apartment complexes or industrial property that is merely rented? Generally, a landlord is not responsible for the injuries of an occupant’s visitor due to the fact that the occupant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden defects, which are hidden and unsafe conditions currently existing when the renter seizes the home. Another exception happens when a proprietor carries out repairs for a renter. The repair works should be performed in a non-negligent way.

Various states follow various guidelines about who might recover for premises liability and under which conditions. Some states focus on the status of the individual going to the residential or commercial property to figure out whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is usually invitee, licensee, or trespasser.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Athol, MA 01331

A guest is someone invited onto a home for a business purpose, such as a client at a mall. A social guest or licensee is also present on the residential or commercial property at the invite or by consent of the homeowner or resident. For invitees and licensees, the invitation is an implied pledge that it is safe to be on the home. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending upon whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, however in other states that acknowledge these distinctions, the greatest task of care is owed to both.

In many states that focus on the status of the visitor to examine liability, trespassers who are on the home without any right to be there and who are harmed are unable to recover at all. The owner or occupant must just refrain from purposefully attempting to harm the trespasser, such as by setting traps. However, in some cases, when an owner understands it is likely there will be a trespasser, it is needed to offer sensible warnings of non-obvious threats to intruders. Typically, the exception to this rule is a kid intruder, who might get involved with an “appealing annoyance,” like a pool, and therefore is owed a greater duty of care.

Stae of the Residential or commercial property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 01331

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the residential or commercial property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Typically, property owner and occupants owe a responsibility to keep residential or commercial property reasonably safe and make repair works for all visitors except for intruders. Elements that are considered when figuring out the task are the scenarios under which the visitor came onto the home, the nature of the residential or commercial property, the reasonableness of the owner or resident’s actions to fix or warn, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant need to frequently examine the home to find unsafe conditions and either repair them or put up a warning so that legal visitors are not injured. Any owner that fails to fulfill this responsibility, such as by understanding of an unsafe condition and failing to alert visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that arise from it.

Limitations on Recovering for Property Liability

Most states follow the principles of comparative fault in facilities liability cases. This means an injured individual who is partly or fully responsible for exactly what happened can not recover for damages developing from a dangerous property condition. A visitor has the responsibility to use sensible care to keep himself or herself safe. To the degree the visitor cannot use sensible care, the healing can be decreased by his or her percentage of fault.

For example, in a state following comparative negligence, when a hurt individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the plaintiff may be unable to recuperate at all if he or she is discovered even a little at fault.