Premises Liability Attorney Auburn, Massachusetts

Facilities Liability Summary for Auburn, Massachusetts

A premises liability suit holds a homeowner responsible for any damages emerging from an injury on that individual or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that inhabit a residential or commercial property must make a reasonable effort to preserve a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the home safe for visitors results in “premises liability.” Common situations that might give rise to properties liability claims are:

  • Animal and Canine Bites
  • Slip and Fall Mishaps
  • Unsafe Residential or commercial property
  • Irresponsible or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Maintenance
  • Children on Home
  • Store Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Business Residences

What about injuries at apartment complexes or industrial residential or commercial property that is simply rented? Typically, a property manager is not responsible for the injuries of an occupant’s visitor since the occupant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the residential or commercial property. However, there are exceptions, such as for latent defects, which are hidden and harmful conditions currently existing when the renter takes possession of the property. Another exception occurs when a landlord undertakes repair works for an occupant. The repair works must be carried out in a non-negligent manner.

Different states follow different guidelines about who may recover for facilities liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the person checking out the residential or commercial property to identify whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is generally guest, licensee, or intruder.

Guests and Tresspassors: Rules for Auburn, MA 01501

An invitee is somebody welcomed onto a home for a business purpose, such as a consumer at a mall. A social visitor or licensee is likewise present on the home at the invite or by authorization of the homeowner or occupant. For invitees and licensees, the invite is an implied guarantee that it is safe to be on the property. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending upon whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, however in other states that recognize these differences, the greatest task of care is owed to both.

In numerous states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to assess liability, trespassers who are on the residential or commercial property with no right to be there and who are harmed are not able to recover at all. The owner or resident must merely refrain from purposefully attempting to harm the trespasser, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, in many cases, when an owner understands it is likely there will be a trespasser, it is needed to offer sensible cautions of non-obvious risks to trespassers. Generally, the exception to this rule is a kid trespasser, who may get involved with an “attractive nuisance,” like a pool, and hence is owed a higher task of care.

Stae of the Home; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 01501

In other states, courts focus on the state of the residential or commercial property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Usually, homeowner and occupants owe a task to keep home reasonably safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Aspects that are thought about when identifying the task are the scenarios under which the visitor came onto the property, the nature of the property, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to fix or caution, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or resident need to routinely check the home to discover unsafe conditions and either repair them or set up a caution so that legal visitors are not injured. Any owner that fails to fulfill this responsibility, such as by knowing of a hazardous condition and cannot caution visitors, can be held liable for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Premises Liability

Most states follow the principles of comparative fault in facilities liability cases. This implies an injured person who is partly or completely responsible for what took place can not recuperate for damages arising from a harmful property condition. A visitor has the duty to use affordable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the level the visitor cannot utilize reasonable care, the recovery can be reduced by his or her portion of fault.

For example, in a state following relative negligence, when a hurt individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributing negligence, the plaintiff may be unable to recuperate at all if she or he is discovered even a little at fault.