Premises Liability Attorney Avon, Massachusetts

Premises Liability Summary for Avon, Massachusetts

A facility liability claim holds a property owner responsible for any damages developing out of an injury on that person or entity’s property. In all states, owners that inhabit a home must make a sensible effort to maintain a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the residential or commercial property safe for visitors results in “properties liability.” Typical situations that may trigger facilities liability lawsuits are:

  • Animal and Dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Mishaps
  • Harmful Property
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Insufficient Maintenance
  • Children on Residential or commercial property
  • Retailer Liability
  • Dining establishment Liability

Commercial Characteristics

What about injuries at apartment building or commercial residential or commercial property that is merely rented? Generally, a property owner is not responsible for the injuries of a tenant’s guest since the tenant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden problems, which are hidden and unsafe conditions already existing when the occupant acquires the property. Another exception occurs when a property manager carries out repairs for a tenant. The repair works should be carried out in a non-negligent way.

Different states follow various rules about who may recuperate for premises liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the individual visiting the residential or commercial property to identify whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is usually invitee, licensee, or trespasser.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Avon, MA 02322

A guest is someone invited onto a property for a commercial purpose, such as a consumer at a shopping center. A social visitor or licensee is also present on the residential or commercial property at the invitation or by authorization of the property owner or resident. For guests and licensees, the invite is an implied guarantee that it is safe to be on the residential or commercial property. In some states, a various responsibility of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, but in other states that recognize these differences, the greatest task of care is owed to both.

In lots of states that focus on the status of the visitor to assess liability, intruders who are on the home without any right to be there and who are injured are not able to recuperate at all. The owner or occupant need to merely avoid deliberately attempting to harm the intruder, such as by setting traps. However, sometimes, when an owner understands it is most likely there will be a trespasser, it is required to give sensible warnings of non-obvious risks to intruders. Normally, the exception to this rule is a kid intruder, who might get included with an “appealing nuisance,” like a swimming pool, and therefore is owed a greater duty of care.

Stae of the Residential or commercial property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 02322

In other states, courts focus on the state of the residential or commercial property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Typically, homeowner and occupants owe a responsibility to keep home reasonably safe and make repair works for all visitors except for intruders. Aspects that are considered when identifying the responsibility are the situations under which the visitor came onto the property, the nature of the residential or commercial property, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to fix or warn, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant need to regularly inspect the residential or commercial property to find hazardous conditions and either fix them or set up a caution so that legal visitors are not hurt. Any owner that cannot meet this duty, such as by knowing of a harmful condition and failing to caution visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Premises Liability

Most states follow the principles of comparative fault in facilities liability cases. This suggests a hurt individual who is partially or totally responsible for exactly what occurred can not recover for damages emerging out of a dangerous home condition. A visitor has the duty to utilize reasonable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the level the visitor fails to use affordable care, the healing can be lowered by his/her percentage of fault.

For example, in a state following comparative negligence, when an injured individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the property owner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributing negligence, the complainant may be unable to recover at all if he or she is found even slightly at fault.