Premises Liability Attorney Cuney, Texas

Properties Liability Overview for Cuney, Texas

A facility liability suit holds a homeowner responsible for any damages developing from an injury on that individual or entity’s home. In all states, owners that occupy a home should make an affordable effort to keep a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the home safe for visitors results in “facilities liability.” Typical situations that may generate premises liability lawsuits are:

  • Animal and Pet Bites
  • Slip and Fall Mishaps
  • Harmful Property
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Insufficient Upkeep
  • Children on Property
  • Retailer Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Business Properties

What about injuries at apartment building or industrial residential or commercial property that is simply leased? Typically, a landlord is not responsible for the injuries of a renter’s guest since the renter is presumed to be in control of the condition of the property. Nevertheless, there are exceptions, such as for latent problems, which are concealed and harmful conditions currently existing when the occupant takes possession of the home. Another exception takes place when a landlord carries out repair works for a tenant. The repairs need to be carried out in a non-negligent way.

Different states follow different rules about who might recover for properties liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the person going to the residential or commercial property to figure out whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is normally guest, licensee, or intruder.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Cuney, TX 75759

An invitee is someone invited onto a property for a commercial function, such as a client at a shopping mall. A social visitor or licensee is also present on the residential or commercial property at the invite or by approval of the homeowner or resident. For guests and licensees, the invite is an implied pledge that it is safe to be on the residential or commercial property. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending upon whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, but in other states that recognize these differences, the greatest task of care is owed to both.

In numerous states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to examine liability, intruders who are on the property with no right to be there and who are harmed are not able to recuperate at all. The owner or resident should simply avoid purposefully attempting to harm the intruder, such as by setting traps. However, in some cases, when an owner knows it is most likely there will be an intruder, it is needed to offer reasonable warnings of non-obvious risks to trespassers. Usually, the exception to this rule is a child trespasser, who may get involved with an “appealing annoyance,” like a swimming pool, and thus is owed a greater task of care.

Stae of the Home; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 75759

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Normally, property owner and occupants owe a responsibility to keep home reasonably safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Factors that are considered when determining the responsibility are the circumstances under which the visitor came onto the property, the nature of the property, the reasonableness of the owner or resident’s actions to repair or caution, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant must regularly examine the residential or commercial property to discover harmful conditions and either repair them or install a warning so that lawful visitors are not injured. Any owner that fails to satisfy this duty, such as by understanding of a hazardous condition and failing to warn visitors, can be held accountable for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Premises Liability

Many states follow the principles of comparative fault in facilities liability cases. This indicates an injured individual who is partly or totally responsible for exactly what took place can not recover for damages emerging out of a harmful home condition. A visitor has the duty to use reasonable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the extent the visitor cannot use sensible care, the recovery can be decreased by his or her percentage of fault.

For instance, in a state following relative negligence, when a hurt individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s recovery will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the complainant may be unable to recover at all if he or she is found even slightly at fault.