Premises Liability Attorney Dimmitt, Texas

Premises Liability Summary for Dimmitt, Texas

A premises liability lawsuit holds a property owner responsible for any damages emerging out of an injury on that individual or entity’s home. In all states, owners that occupy a residential or commercial property should make a reasonable effort to keep a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the home safe for visitors leads to “properties liability.” Common situations that might give rise to premises liability suits are:

  • Animal and Pet Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Hazardous Property
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Swimming Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Maintenance
  • Children on Home
  • Store Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Business Residences

Exactly what about injuries at apartment complexes or industrial home that is merely rented? Generally, a property manager is not responsible for the injuries of a tenant’s visitor since the occupant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the home. Nevertheless, there are exceptions, such as for hidden problems, which are hidden and hazardous conditions currently existing when the renter acquires the residential or commercial property. Another exception happens when a landlord undertakes repair works for an occupant. The repair works must be performed in a non-negligent manner.

Various states follow various rules about who may recuperate for properties liability and under which conditions. Some states focus on the status of the individual going to the home to figure out whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is normally guest, licensee, or intruder.

Guests and Tresspassors: Rules for Dimmitt, TX 79027

An invitee is someone welcomed onto a home for a business purpose, such as a customer at a mall. A social guest or licensee is also present on the residential or commercial property at the invitation or by consent of the property owner or occupant. For guests and licensees, the invite is an implied guarantee that it is safe to be on the home. In some states, a various task of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, however in other states that acknowledge these distinctions, the highest responsibility of care is owed to both.

In many states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to assess liability, trespassers who are on the property with no right to be there and who are hurt are not able to recuperate at all. The owner or occupant must simply avoid deliberately aiming to harm the trespasser, such as by setting traps. However, in some cases, when an owner understands it is likely there will be a trespasser, it is required to offer sensible cautions of non-obvious dangers to trespassers. Normally, the exception to this guideline is a child intruder, who may get involved with an “attractive nuisance,” like a swimming pool, and thus is owed a higher responsibility of care.

Stae of the Residential or commercial property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 79027

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the home and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Generally, homeowner and residents owe a task to keep residential or commercial property reasonably safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Aspects that are thought about when determining the duty are the situations under which the visitor came onto the home, the nature of the home, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to fix or warn, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant need to regularly check the home to discover hazardous conditions and either repair them or put up a warning so that legal visitors are not hurt. Any owner that cannot satisfy this responsibility, such as by understanding of a dangerous condition and failing to alert visitors, can be held liable for visitors’ injuries that arise from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Premises Liability

The majority of states follow the principles of comparative fault in premises liability cases. This suggests a hurt person who is partially or totally responsible for what happened can not recuperate for damages emerging out of a hazardous residential or commercial property condition. A visitor has the responsibility to use sensible care to keep himself or herself safe. To the degree the visitor fails to use affordable care, the healing can be decreased by his/her portion of fault.

For example, in a state following comparative negligence, when a hurt person is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the plaintiff might be unable to recuperate at all if she or he is found even a little at fault.