Premises Liability Attorney Dryden, Texas

Facilities Liability Summary for Dryden, Texas

A property liability lawsuit holds a homeowner responsible for any damages emerging out of an injury on that person or entity’s property. In all states, owners that inhabit a residential or commercial property needs to make a sensible effort to maintain a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the residential or commercial property safe for visitors results in “premises liability.” Typical circumstances that may give rise to premises liability claims are:

  • Animal and Dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Dangerous Home
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Swimming Pool Injury
  • Insufficient Maintenance
  • Kids on Residential or commercial property
  • Retailer Liability
  • Dining establishment Liability

Commercial Properties

What about injuries at apartment building or industrial property that is simply rented? Typically, a proprietor is not responsible for the injuries of a renter’s guest due to the fact that the occupant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the home. Nevertheless, there are exceptions, such as for hidden problems, which are concealed and dangerous conditions already existing when the occupant acquires the property. Another exception occurs when a property manager carries out repairs for a renter. The repair works should be carried out in a non-negligent way.

Different states follow various guidelines about who may recover for facilities liability and under which conditions. Some states focus on the status of the person going to the property to figure out whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is usually invitee, licensee, or intruder.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Dryden, TX 78851

An invitee is someone welcomed onto a property for a business function, such as a customer at a mall. A social visitor or licensee is also present on the residential or commercial property at the invite or by authorization of the homeowner or resident. For guests and licensees, the invitation is an implied pledge that it is safe to be on the home. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is an invitee or licensee, however in other states that recognize these distinctions, the highest duty of care is owed to both.

In many states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to assess liability, trespassers who are on the property with no right to be there and who are injured are unable to recover at all. The owner or occupant should simply avoid purposefully aiming to hurt the intruder, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, in many cases, when an owner understands it is most likely there will be a trespasser, it is needed to offer sensible warnings of non-obvious risks to trespassers. Generally, the exception to this rule is a kid trespasser, who may get involved with an “attractive problem,” like a pool, and therefore is owed a higher task of care.

Stae of the Home; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 78851

In other states, courts focus on the state of the property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Usually, homeowner and residents owe a duty to keep home reasonably safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Factors that are considered when figuring out the duty are the circumstances under which the visitor came onto the home, the nature of the residential or commercial property, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to repair or caution, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or resident must regularly inspect the home to discover unsafe conditions and either repair them or set up a warning so that legal visitors are not hurt. Any owner that fails to meet this duty, such as by knowing of an unsafe condition and cannot alert visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recuperating for Property Liability

A lot of states follow the concepts of relative fault in premises liability cases. This means a hurt individual who is partly or fully responsible for what took place can not recuperate for damages developing from a hazardous property condition. A visitor has the task to use reasonable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the extent the visitor fails to use affordable care, the healing can be lowered by his or her percentage of fault.

For example, in a state following relative negligence, when an injured individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s recovery will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributing negligence, the plaintiff might be unable to recuperate at all if he or she is discovered even a little at fault.