Premises Liability Attorney Galena, Alaska

Properties Liability Overview for Galena, Alaska

A premises liability claim holds a property owner responsible for any damages emerging out of an injury on that person or entity’s home. In all states, owners that occupy a residential or commercial property should make an affordable effort to preserve a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the home safe for visitors results in “properties liability.” Typical situations that might give rise to premises liability lawsuits are:

  • Animal and Pet Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Unsafe Home
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Maintenance
  • Children on Property
  • Retail Store Liability
  • Dining establishment Liability

Industrial Residences

What about injuries at apartment building or commercial residential or commercial property that is simply leased? Usually, a property owner is not responsible for the injuries of an occupant’s guest since the renter is presumed to be in control of the condition of the home. Nevertheless, there are exceptions, such as for hidden problems, which are hidden and hazardous conditions currently existing when the renter acquires the residential or commercial property. Another exception takes place when a property manager undertakes repair works for a tenant. The repairs need to be carried out in a non-negligent manner.

Different states follow various guidelines about who might recuperate for premises liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the person going to the property to figure out whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is typically invitee, licensee, or trespasser.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Galena, AK 99741

A guest is somebody welcomed onto a residential or commercial property for a business purpose, such as a consumer at a shopping mall. A social guest or licensee is likewise present on the property at the invitation or by authorization of the property owner or occupant. For guests and licensees, the invitation is an implied guarantee that it is safe to be on the property. In some states, a different responsibility of care is owed depending upon whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, however in other states that recognize these distinctions, the highest task of care is owed to both.

In lots of states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to assess liability, intruders who are on the residential or commercial property without any right to be there and who are hurt are unable to recover at all. The owner or occupant must merely avoid purposefully aiming to injure the intruder, such as by setting traps. However, sometimes, when an owner knows it is likely there will be an intruder, it is needed to offer reasonable cautions of non-obvious dangers to trespassers. Generally, the exception to this rule is a kid trespasser, who might get involved with an “attractive annoyance,” like a pool, and hence is owed a greater duty of care.

Stae of the Residential or commercial property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 99741

In other states, courts focus on the state of the residential or commercial property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Usually, property owner and occupants owe a duty to keep residential or commercial property reasonably safe and make repair works for all visitors except for trespassers. Elements that are considered when figuring out the task are the situations under which the visitor came onto the home, the nature of the property, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to repair or warn, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant need to regularly inspect the home to find hazardous conditions and either repair them or install a warning so that lawful visitors are not injured. Any owner that cannot meet this duty, such as by knowing of a hazardous condition and failing to warn visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that arise from it.

Limitations on Recovering for Premises Liability

The majority of states follow the concepts of comparative fault in premises liability cases. This suggests a hurt individual who is partially or fully responsible for what occurred can not recuperate for damages arising from a hazardous home condition. A visitor has the duty to utilize reasonable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the extent the visitor cannot utilize reasonable care, the recovery can be reduced by his or her percentage of fault.

For example, in a state following relative negligence, when an injured person is 10% responsible for an injury, the property owner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the plaintiff may be not able to recover at all if he or she is discovered even somewhat at fault.