Premises Liability Attorney Hilo, Hawaii

Properties Liability Summary for Hilo, Hawaii

A facility liability lawsuit holds a homeowner responsible for any damages occurring out of an injury on that individual or entity’s home. In all states, owners that inhabit a residential or commercial property needs to make a reasonable effort to maintain a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the residential or commercial property safe for visitors leads to “facilities liability.” Common scenarios that might give rise to facilities liability lawsuits are:

  • Animal and Dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Harmful Residential or commercial property
  • Irresponsible or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Insufficient Maintenance
  • Kids on Home
  • Retail Store Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Commercial Residences

Exactly what about injuries at apartment complexes or business property that is merely rented? Usually, a property owner is not responsible for the injuries of an occupant’s guest because the tenant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the residential or commercial property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden defects, which are hidden and unsafe conditions already existing when the tenant seizes the home. Another exception takes place when a landlord undertakes repair works for a tenant. The repairs must be performed in a non-negligent manner.

Various states follow different rules about who may recuperate for properties liability and under which conditions. Some states focus on the status of the individual going to the property to identify whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is generally invitee, licensee, or trespasser.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Hilo, HI 96720

An invitee is someone welcomed onto a residential or commercial property for a commercial purpose, such as a consumer at a shopping center. A social visitor or licensee is likewise present on the home at the invite or by approval of the property owner or resident. For invitees and licensees, the invitation is an implied pledge that it is safe to be on the residential or commercial property. In some states, a various task of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is an invitee or licensee, however in other states that acknowledge these distinctions, the highest duty of care is owed to both.

In numerous states that focus on the status of the visitor to assess liability, trespassers who are on the residential or commercial property without any right to be there and who are injured are unable to recuperate at all. The owner or resident must merely refrain from purposefully aiming to harm the trespasser, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, sometimes, when an owner understands it is most likely there will be an intruder, it is required to offer affordable warnings of non-obvious threats to intruders. Normally, the exception to this guideline is a child intruder, who may get included with an “appealing annoyance,” like a swimming pool, and thus is owed a greater task of care.

Stae of the Residential or commercial property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 96720

In other states, courts focus on the state of the property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Generally, property owner and occupants owe a task to keep property fairly safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Aspects that are considered when determining the task are the situations under which the visitor came onto the property, the nature of the home, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to repair or caution, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant need to regularly inspect the home to find unsafe conditions and either repair them or set up a caution so that lawful visitors are not hurt. Any owner that cannot satisfy this task, such as by knowing of a harmful condition and failing to alert visitors, can be held liable for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recovering for Premises Liability

A lot of states follow the principles of comparative fault in facilities liability cases. This implies a hurt individual who is partly or completely responsible for what took place can not recover for damages emerging from a harmful residential or commercial property condition. A visitor has the task to use reasonable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the level the visitor fails to use reasonable care, the recovery can be minimized by his/her percentage of fault.

For instance, in a state following comparative negligence, when an injured person is 10% responsible for an injury, the property owner is responsible for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s recovery will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the complainant might be not able to recover at all if she or he is discovered even slightly at fault.