Premises Liability Attorney Lucas, Ohio

Facilities Liability Overview for Lucas, Ohio

A facility liability claim holds a property owner responsible for any damages occurring from an injury on that person or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that inhabit a residential or commercial property needs to make an affordable effort to preserve a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the home safe for visitors leads to “facilities liability.” Common situations that may trigger facilities liability lawsuits are:

  • Animal and Canine Bites
  • Slip and Fall Mishaps
  • Harmful Property
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Insufficient Maintenance
  • Children on Residential or commercial property
  • Retail Store Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Business Residences

Exactly what about injuries at apartment building or business residential or commercial property that is simply leased? Normally, a property manager is not responsible for the injuries of an occupant’s visitor since the renter is presumed to be in control of the condition of the residential or commercial property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden defects, which are hidden and dangerous conditions currently existing when the occupant takes possession of the residential or commercial property. Another exception happens when a landlord carries out repairs for a renter. The repairs need to be carried out in a non-negligent way.

Various states follow various rules about who might recuperate for properties liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the individual checking out the residential or commercial property to identify whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is generally invitee, licensee, or intruder.

Guests and Tresspassors: Rules for Lucas, OH 44843

A guest is someone invited onto a home for a business purpose, such as a customer at a mall. A social visitor or licensee is also present on the property at the invite or by permission of the property owner or occupant. For guests and licensees, the invite is an implied pledge that it is safe to be on the residential or commercial property. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending on whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, but in other states that acknowledge these differences, the greatest duty of care is owed to both.

In numerous states that focus on the status of the visitor to assess liability, intruders who are on the property with no right to be there and who are hurt are unable to recuperate at all. The owner or resident must simply avoid intentionally trying to harm the intruder, such as by setting traps. However, in many cases, when an owner knows it is likely there will be an intruder, it is needed to give affordable cautions of non-obvious dangers to trespassers. Typically, the exception to this guideline is a child trespasser, who might get included with an “appealing nuisance,” like a swimming pool, and hence is owed a greater duty of care.

Stae of the Home; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 44843

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the home and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Typically, property owner and residents owe a responsibility to keep residential or commercial property fairly safe and make repairs for all visitors except for intruders. Aspects that are considered when figuring out the duty are the circumstances under which the visitor came onto the home, the nature of the home, the reasonableness of the owner or resident’s actions to fix or alert, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant should routinely inspect the residential or commercial property to find dangerous conditions and either fix them or set up a warning so that legal visitors are not injured. Any owner that cannot meet this responsibility, such as by understanding of an unsafe condition and failing to caution visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that arise from it.

Limitations on Recovering for Property Liability

Many states follow the concepts of relative fault in properties liability cases. This implies a hurt individual who is partly or fully responsible for exactly what happened can not recover for damages occurring from a harmful property condition. A visitor has the responsibility to utilize reasonable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the degree the visitor fails to use affordable care, the recovery can be decreased by his/her percentage of fault.

For example, in a state following relative negligence, when a hurt individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s healing will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributing negligence, the complainant may be unable to recuperate at all if he or she is discovered even a little at fault.