Premises Liability Attorney Penn, Pennsylvania

Premises Liability Summary for Penn, Pennsylvania

A premises liability lawsuit holds a property owner responsible for any damages arising from an injury on that person or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that inhabit a home needs to make a sensible effort to preserve a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the property safe for visitors leads to “premises liability.” Typical situations that might give rise to properties liability claims are:

  • Animal and Pet dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Unsafe Home
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Maintenance
  • Kids on Home
  • Retailer Liability
  • Dining establishment Liability

Commercial Residences

What about injuries at apartment building or business home that is merely leased? Generally, a property manager is not responsible for the injuries of an occupant’s guest since the renter is presumed to be in control of the condition of the home. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden defects, which are concealed and harmful conditions currently existing when the renter takes possession of the property. Another exception occurs when a property manager undertakes repair works for a renter. The repairs need to be carried out in a non-negligent manner.

Various states follow various guidelines about who might recuperate for properties liability and under which conditions. Some states focus on the status of the individual checking out the residential or commercial property to determine whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is normally guest, licensee, or intruder.

Guests and Tresspassors: Rules for Penn, PA 15675

A guest is someone invited onto a residential or commercial property for a commercial purpose, such as a customer at a mall. A social visitor or licensee is also present on the home at the invitation or by approval of the property owner or occupant. For invitees and licensees, the invitation is an implied guarantee that it is safe to be on the property. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending upon whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, however in other states that recognize these differences, the greatest duty of care is owed to both.

In numerous states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to evaluate liability, trespassers who are on the residential or commercial property with no right to be there and who are hurt are not able to recuperate at all. The owner or occupant need to merely avoid intentionally trying to harm the intruder, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, in many cases, when an owner understands it is likely there will be an intruder, it is required to give sensible cautions of non-obvious threats to trespassers. Usually, the exception to this rule is a child intruder, who may get involved with an “appealing problem,” like a pool, and therefore is owed a greater duty of care.

Stae of the Property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 15675

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Typically, homeowner and residents owe a task to keep property fairly safe and make repairs for all visitors except for trespassers. Elements that are considered when figuring out the duty are the scenarios under which the visitor came onto the residential or commercial property, the nature of the home, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to repair or caution, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or resident must routinely examine the residential or commercial property to find unsafe conditions and either fix them or put up a warning so that lawful visitors are not injured. Any owner that fails to fulfill this duty, such as by understanding of a hazardous condition and cannot warn visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recovering for Premises Liability

The majority of states follow the principles of relative fault in premises liability cases. This indicates an injured person who is partially or fully responsible for exactly what happened can not recuperate for damages developing out of an unsafe property condition. A visitor has the duty to use sensible care to keep himself or herself safe. To the degree the visitor fails to utilize reasonable care, the recovery can be lowered by his or her portion of fault.

For example, in a state following comparative negligence, when a hurt individual is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s recovery will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the complainant may be unable to recover at all if she or he is found even somewhat at fault.