Premises Liability Attorney Valley Lee, Maryland

Premises Liability Introduction for Valley Lee, Maryland

A property liability claim holds a property owner responsible for any damages occurring from an injury on that individual or entity’s residential or commercial property. In all states, owners that inhabit a residential or commercial property needs to make a reasonable effort to maintain a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the property safe for visitors results in “premises liability.” Common scenarios that may generate facilities liability lawsuits are:

  • Animal and Pet dog Bites
  • Slip and Fall Mishaps
  • Dangerous Residential or commercial property
  • Irresponsible or Inadequate Security
  • Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Upkeep
  • Kids on Property
  • Retailer Liability
  • Restaurant Liability

Industrial Characteristics

Exactly what about injuries at apartment complexes or commercial property that is simply rented? Generally, a property manager is not responsible for the injuries of an occupant’s visitor because the renter is presumed to be in control of the condition of the property. However, there are exceptions, such as for hidden problems, which are concealed and harmful conditions currently existing when the tenant acquires the property. Another exception happens when a property manager carries out repairs for a renter. The repairs should be performed in a non-negligent way.

Different states follow various guidelines about who may recover for facilities liability and under which conditions. Some states concentrate on the status of the person visiting the home to determine whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is typically guest, licensee, or intruder.

Guests and Tresspassors: Rules for Valley Lee, MD 20692

An invitee is someone invited onto a residential or commercial property for an industrial purpose, such as a consumer at a shopping mall. A social guest or licensee is also present on the property at the invitation or by authorization of the homeowner or resident. For guests and licensees, the invitation is an implied guarantee that it is safe to be on the residential or commercial property. In some states, a different responsibility of care is owed depending upon whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, however in other states that acknowledge these differences, the highest task of care is owed to both.

In numerous states that concentrate on the status of the visitor to assess liability, trespassers who are on the property with no right to be there and who are injured are not able to recuperate at all. The owner or occupant must just avoid deliberately trying to harm the intruder, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, in many cases, when an owner knows it is most likely there will be a trespasser, it is required to offer affordable warnings of non-obvious threats to intruders. Generally, the exception to this guideline is a child trespasser, who may get involved with an “appealing annoyance,” like a swimming pool, and hence is owed a higher task of care.

Stae of the Property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 20692

In other states, courts concentrate on the state of the property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Generally, homeowner and residents owe a task to keep property fairly safe and make repair works for all visitors except for intruders. Factors that are considered when determining the task are the circumstances under which the visitor came onto the residential or commercial property, the nature of the home, the reasonableness of the owner or occupant’s actions to repair or caution, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant should routinely check the residential or commercial property to find harmful conditions and either repair them or set up a warning so that legal visitors are not injured. Any owner that cannot satisfy this responsibility, such as by knowing of a dangerous condition and failing to caution visitors, can be held responsible for visitors’ injuries that result from it.

Limitations on Recovering for Premises Liability

Many states follow the concepts of relative fault in properties liability cases. This suggests an injured individual who is partly or fully responsible for exactly what took place can not recover for damages arising out of an unsafe property condition. A visitor has the responsibility to utilize affordable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the degree the visitor fails to use affordable care, the healing can be minimized by his or her percentage of fault.

For example, in a state following relative negligence, when an injured person is 10% responsible for an injury, the homeowner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the total damages are $100,000, the victim’s recovery will be only $90,000. In states that follow contributing negligence, the complainant may be unable to recuperate at all if he or she is found even somewhat at fault.