Premises Liability Attorney Westlake, Louisiana

Facilities Liability Summary for Westlake, Louisiana

A premises liability lawsuit holds a homeowner responsible for any damages emerging out of an injury on that individual or entity’s home. In all states, owners that inhabit a property needs to make a sensible effort to maintain a safe environment for visitors to it. Failure to keep the home safe for visitors results in “facilities liability.” Typical scenarios that may generate facilities liability claims are:

  • Animal and Pet Bites
  • Slip and Fall Accidents
  • Unsafe Property
  • Negligent or Inadequate Security
  • Swimming Pool Injury
  • Inadequate Maintenance
  • Kids on Residential or commercial property
  • Retailer Liability
  • Dining establishment Liability

Commercial Properties

What about injuries at apartment building or business residential or commercial property that is simply rented? Usually, a proprietor is not responsible for the injuries of a renter’s visitor since the tenant is presumed to be in control of the condition of the residential or commercial property. However, there are exceptions, such as for latent problems, which are hidden and unsafe conditions already existing when the renter seizes the home. Another exception occurs when a landlord undertakes repair works for a renter. The repair works need to be carried out in a non-negligent manner.

Different states follow various rules about who might recuperate for premises liability and under which conditions. Some states focus on the status of the individual checking out the property to identify whether liability is appropriate. The status of a visitor in those states is typically guest, licensee, or intruder.

Invitees and Tresspassors: Rules for Westlake, LA 70669

An invitee is someone invited onto a residential or commercial property for an industrial purpose, such as a client at a mall. A social visitor or licensee is also present on the property at the invite or by permission of the property owner or occupant. For invitees and licensees, the invitation is an implied pledge that it is safe to be on the residential or commercial property. In some states, a different duty of care is owed depending upon whether a visitor is a guest or licensee, however in other states that acknowledge these distinctions, the highest duty of care is owed to both.

In lots of states that focus on the status of the visitor to evaluate liability, trespassers who are on the home with no right to be there and who are injured are unable to recover at all. The owner or occupant should just avoid deliberately aiming to injure the trespasser, such as by setting traps. Nevertheless, in many cases, when an owner knows it is most likely there will be a trespasser, it is needed to give sensible warnings of non-obvious dangers to intruders. Normally, the exception to this guideline is a child intruder, who may get included with an “appealing annoyance,” like a swimming pool, and thus is owed a higher duty of care.

Stae of the Residential or commercial property; Owner’s and Visitor’s Actions, for 70669

In other states, courts focus on the state of the property and the owner’s and visitor’s actions. Generally, homeowner and occupants owe a responsibility to keep home fairly safe and make repairs for all visitors except for intruders. Factors that are considered when identifying the task are the situations under which the visitor came onto the home, the nature of the home, the reasonableness of the owner or resident’s actions to fix or warn, and the foreseeability of the injury.


An owner or occupant should routinely inspect the residential or commercial property to find unsafe conditions and either repair them or install a caution so that lawful visitors are not injured. Any owner that fails to fulfill this duty, such as by knowing of a harmful condition and cannot warn visitors, can be held liable for visitors’ injuries that arise from it.

Limitations on Recovering for Property Liability

Many states follow the concepts of relative fault in premises liability cases. This implies a hurt individual who is partly or totally responsible for what happened can not recuperate for damages developing out of a hazardous property condition. A visitor has the task to use reasonable care to keep himself or herself safe. To the level the visitor fails to use reasonable care, the healing can be minimized by his or her percentage of fault.

For instance, in a state following comparative negligence, when a hurt person is 10% responsible for an injury, the property owner is accountable for 90% of the injury, and the overall damages are $100,000, the victim’s recovery will be just $90,000. In states that follow contributory negligence, the complainant might be unable to recuperate at all if he or she is found even slightly at fault.